Last updated: October 2026

When a tenancy comes to an end, one of the most common areas of disagreement between landlords and tenants is how much of the deposit should be returned.

A tenancy deposit provides financial protection where a tenant has breached their tenancy obligations, but landlords cannot automatically deduct money for cleaning, repairs or replacement items.

At Wrights Residential, we use the Deposit Protection Service (DPS) Custodial Scheme to protect deposits for our Fully Managed properties and most of our Tenant Introduction properties.

Understanding what constitutes a reasonable deduction, and what evidence is required, can help landlords avoid unnecessary disputes and achieve a fair outcome.

 

What Can a Landlord Deduct From a Tenancy Deposit?

Landlords may be entitled to make deductions for:

  • Unpaid rent or other outstanding amounts for which the tenant is liable under the tenancy agreement.
  • Damage to the property or its contents beyond fair wear and tear.
  • Cleaning required to return the property to its original standard of cleanliness.
  • Missing or damaged items included in the inventory.
  • Other proven financial losses arising from a breach of the tenancy agreement.

However, any deduction must be reasonable and supported by evidence. A landlord cannot simply decide to retain part of the deposit because the property requires work after the tenant leaves.

What Is Fair Wear and Tear?

Fair wear and tear refers to the natural deterioration of a property and its contents through normal, everyday use.

For example, minor scuff marks on walls, gradual fading of decoration and general carpet wear in frequently used areas would normally be considered fair wear and tear.

Damage such as burns, large stains, broken fixtures or holes in walls may justify a deduction.

When assessing fair wear and tear, factors to consider include:

  • The length of the tenancy.
  • The number of occupants living at the property.
  • The age and original condition of the item.
  • The quality and expected lifespan of the item.
  • Whether the deterioration is consistent with normal use.

These factors help establish whether the condition is reasonable or whether the tenant may be responsible for damage beyond normal use.

Four Common Deposit Deduction Examples

The following examples demonstrate how deductions may be assessed in practice.

1. A Stained or Damaged Carpet

A carpet has a large stain that cannot be removed through cleaning. The landlord may be entitled to compensation, but not necessarily the full cost of replacing the carpet.

For example, if a carpet originally cost £500, had an estimated lifespan of 10 years and was four years old when damaged, an illustrative calculation would be:

£500 ÷ 10 years = £50 per year.

Six years of remaining lifespan × £50 = £300.

In this example, £300 might represent a reasonable starting point for a claim where replacement is necessary, rather than the full £500 cost.

This is only an illustration. There is no fixed DPS lifespan for carpets, and the actual amount will depend on the carpet's quality, original condition, evidence of its age and whether cleaning or repair would be sufficient.

2. Marks and Damage to Walls

A few light scuff marks after several years of occupation would usually be considered fair wear and tear. However, extensive marking, large holes or other damage may justify a contribution towards repairs or redecoration.

For example, if a room was freshly decorated at the beginning of a tenancy and the decoration had an estimated lifespan of five years:

  • After one year: Extensive marking or damage requiring redecoration may justify a substantial contribution towards the reasonable cost.
  • After three years: Some general scuffing and deterioration would be expected. If the tenant caused excessive damage, a reduced contribution may be appropriate.
  • After five years: The decoration may already be due for renewal, meaning a deduction for redecoration could be minimal or unjustified, particularly where the issue is general wear rather than specific damage.

Landlords must consider the original condition of the decoration, the length of the tenancy, the number of occupants and whether the damage goes beyond normal use.

The landlord cannot expect the tenant to pay for complete redecoration where this would leave the property in a better condition than it would otherwise have been.

There is no fixed DPS lifespan for decoration, and its age does not automatically excuse deliberate or excessive damage. For example, a large hole in a wall may still justify a reasonable repair deduction even where the room was last decorated five years ago.

3. An Oven Left Heavily Soiled

If the check-in inventory confirms that the oven was clean and the check-out report shows it was left heavily soiled, a reasonable cleaning deduction may be justified.

However, if the oven was already dirty when the tenancy began, the landlord cannot expect the tenant to return it in a better condition.

Tenants are not automatically required to use professional cleaners, provided they achieve the required standard of cleanliness.

4. A Damaged Kitchen Worktop

If a tenant causes a burn, deep scratch or other significant damage to a kitchen worktop, the landlord may be entitled to compensation.

However, replacing an entire kitchen because of damage to one section would rarely be a reasonable starting point.

The landlord should consider whether a repair is possible, the original age and condition of the worktop, and the actual financial loss caused by the damage.

These examples are illustrative. The amount awarded in any deposit dispute will depend on the individual circumstances and supporting evidence.

Can a Landlord Charge for Replacing Items or Redecorating?

Yes, where a tenant has caused damage beyond fair wear and tear. However, landlords cannot generally charge the full cost of replacing an older item with a brand-new equivalent.

This is because of the principle of betterment, which prevents landlords from being placed in a better position at the tenant's expense.

Where replacement is necessary, the item's original condition, quality, age and remaining expected lifespan should be taken into account.

For example, a landlord cannot normally expect a tenant to pay the full cost of replacing a ten-year-old carpet with a brand-new carpet, even where the tenant has caused damage.

Similarly, if decoration was already approaching the end of its reasonable lifespan, the landlord may only be entitled to a limited contribution towards redecoration, depending on the circumstances.

Why Are Inventories and Check-Out Reports So Important?

The landlord must be able to demonstrate that a deduction is justified.

A detailed inventory and schedule of condition at the beginning of the tenancy establishes the original condition of the property, including decoration, carpets, fixtures, fittings and cleanliness.

A check-out report then records the condition when the tenant leaves, allowing a direct comparison.

Useful supporting evidence can include:

  • A detailed check-in inventory and schedule of condition.
  • A check-out inspection report.
  • Dated photographs showing the property's condition.
  • The signed tenancy agreement and relevant terms.
  • Contractor quotations, invoices and receipts.
  • Correspondence with the tenant regarding damage or cleaning.

Without sufficient evidence, a landlord may struggle to recover a deduction even where damage has occurred.

How Does the DPS Custodial Scheme Work?

Wrights Residential uses the Deposit Protection Service (DPS) Custodial Scheme, which means the deposit is held securely by the DPS rather than by the landlord or letting agent.

At the end of the tenancy, the deposit repayment process is initiated and any proposed deductions are communicated to the tenant.

If both parties agree on the deductions, the deposit can be distributed accordingly.

If they cannot agree, the DPS offers a free independent dispute resolution service. Both parties can submit supporting evidence, which is reviewed by an independent adjudicator.

The adjudicator then determines how the disputed deposit should be allocated, based on the evidence provided.

What Happens If the Tenant Disputes a Deduction?

The first step should usually be to discuss the proposed deduction and try to reach an agreement.

If the disagreement cannot be resolved, it may be referred to the DPS dispute resolution service, subject to the scheme's procedures.

The adjudicator considers the evidence submitted by both parties. The landlord must demonstrate that the tenant was responsible for the loss and that the amount claimed is reasonable.

A contractor's quotation alone does not necessarily establish that the tenant is responsible for the work.

The DPS dispute resolution service provides an impartial way of resolving disagreements without the need for court proceedings, where both parties agree to use it.

How Wrights Residential Can Help

At Wrights Residential, we protect tenancy deposits through the DPS Custodial Scheme for our Fully Managed landlords and most of our Tenant Introduction landlords.

Fully Managed Landlords

For our Fully Managed properties, we assist with the end-of-tenancy process, including arranging check-out inspections, reviewing the property's condition against the original inventory and liaising with tenants regarding proposed deductions.

Where deductions are appropriate, we can assist with gathering supporting evidence, negotiating a fair settlement and managing the DPS repayment process.

Tenant Introduction Landlords

For Tenant Introduction landlords whose deposits we protect, the deposit remains securely held by the DPS.

However, responsibility for the ongoing tenancy, check-out inspection and establishing any proposed deductions will generally remain with the landlord unless additional services have been agreed.

Our aim is to help landlords understand their responsibilities, protect their interests and ensure that deposit deductions are fair, proportionate and supported by appropriate evidence.

Please note: This article provides general guidance for landlords in England and is based on legislation and Deposit Protection Service guidance available at the date of publication. Deposit deductions are assessed according to the individual circumstances and supporting evidence. This article should not be relied upon as legal advice.

arlatpodpsrightmovezooplaprimelocation2onthemarket